AI HR Solutions: Top Networking LinkedIn Groups for LinkedIn Hiring Excellence in 2026

Cora Partners is a small, privately owned recruitment company with offices in London and the West Country, the South of France and the Alps. Rather than being industry specific, we work closely with our clients to provide an individually tailored service encompassing recruitment needs in, Family Offices, Rural Estates and seasonal Second Homes. With over 15 years' experience we have handled projects including the staffing of luxury Ski Lodges, Villas in the Mediterranean,in London and the Home Counties, Rural Estates from Dorset to the North of Scotland, and finding support staff in Small and Mid sized Family Offices and Private Equity companies. This group is for the sharing of ideas, queries and industry expertise for senior level employees within the Private Household and Family Office Domaines. Please feel free to share your tips, ask questions, help each other out and post articles of relevance or interest.

A non-profit, private and exclusive global community for professionals working in private service. The network connects professionals in U/HNW households, single-family offices, private estates, yachts, and private aviation to share knowledge, expertise, and recommendations. The group’s mission is to educate, share recommendations, assist with sourcing, be there for each others, supporting like- minded professionals. Members are encouraged to contribute their expertise and knowledge, fostering a collaborative and resourceful community.

FMI "Fiscal monitor - Taxing times, October 2013" : see http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fm/2013/02/pdf/fm1302.pdf. The short text is following : " The sharp deterioration of the public finances in many countries has revived interest in a “capital levy”— a one-off tax onwealth—as an exceptional measure to restore debt sustainability.1 1 As for instance in Bach (2012). The appeal is that such a tax, if it is implemented before avoidance is possible and there is a belief that it will never be repeated, does not distort behavior (and may be seen by some as fair). There have been illustrious supporters, including Pigou, Ricardo, Schumpeter, and —until he changed his mind — Keynes. The conditions for success are strong, but also need to be weighed against the risks of the alternatives, which include repudiating public debt or inflating it away (these, in turn, are a particular form of wealth tax—on bondholders—that also falls on nonresidents). There is a surprisingly large amount of experience to draw on, as such levies were widely adopted in Europe after World War I and in Germany and Japan after World War II. Reviewed in Eichengreen (1990), this experience suggests that more notable than any loss of credibility was a simple failure to achieve debt reduction, largely because the delay in introduction gave space for extensive avoidance and capital flight—in turn spurring inflation. The tax rates needed to bring down public debt to precrisis levels, moreover, are sizable : reducing debt ratios to end-2007 levels would require (for a sample of 15 euro area countries) a tax rate of about 10 percent onwith positive net wealth.2" 2 IMF staff calculation using the Eurosystem’s Household Finance and Consumption Survey (Household Finance and Consumption Network, 2013); unweighted average.

The RSBY scheme is not the first attempt to provide health insurance to low income workers by the Government in India. The RSBY scheme, however, differs from these schemes in several important ways. Empowering the beneficiary – RSBY provides the participating BPL household with freedom of choice between public andhospitals and makes him a potential client worth attracting on account of the significant revenues that hospitals stand to earn through the scheme. Business Model for all Stakeholders – The scheme has been designed as a business model for a social sector scheme with incentives built for each stakeholder. This business model design is conducive both in terms of expansion of the scheme as well as for its long run sustainability. • Insurers – The insurer is paid premium for each household enrolled for RSBY. Therefore, the insurer has the motivation to enroll as manyas possible from the BPL list. This will result in better coverage of targeted beneficiaries. • Hospitals – A hospital has the incentive to provide treatment to large number of beneficiaries as it is paid per beneficiary treated. Even public hospitals have the incentive to treat beneficiaries under RSBY as the money from the insurer will flow directly to the concerned public hospital which they can use for their own purposes. Insurers, in contrast, will monitor participating hospitals in order to prevent unnecessary procedures or fraud resulting in excessive claims. • Intermediaries – The inclusion of intermediaries such as NGOs and MFIs which have a greater stake in assisting BPL households. The intermediaries will be paid for the services they render in reaching out to the beneficiaries.